ACUSON Sequoia Diagnostic Ultrasound System; ACUSON Sequoia Select Diagnostic Ultrasound System; ACUSON Origin Diagnostic Ultrasound System; ACUSON Origin ICE Diagnostic Ultrasound System
K242523Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · cleared 2024-11-19 · product code IYN · Radiology
Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted
source quote (p.8)
“The ACUSON Sequoia, Sequoia Select, Origin and Origin ICE Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems are multi-purpose, mobile, software-controlled, diagnostic ultrasound systems with an on-screen display of thermal and mechanical indices related to potential bio-effect mechanisms. Also this Traditional 510(k) includes AI Abdomen which leverages AI Measure and AI Assist features released on the predicate ACUSON Origin (K240704), Trace AI which is an improvement of the generic eclipse measurement tool released on predicate ACUSON Origin (K240704) to enable an improved customer experience.”
source quote (p.13)
“AI Abdomen covers a set of semi-automated Abdomen view classifications and measurements for B-Mode acquisitions. Trace AI is a semi-automated measurement tool that provides an ability to measure orifice-type anatomic structures on MPRs generated from volumetric ICE, TEE and TTE transducers.”
Validation studies (2)
Retrospective clinical
n=105 patients · 3 site(s)
endpoints: view classification success rate; Individual Equivalence Coefficient (IEC)
standards: ISO 10993-1, IEC 60601-1-6, ANSI AAMI ISO 14971, FDA Ultrasound Guidance document
Retrospective clinical
n=10 patients · 3 site(s)
endpoints: DICE coefficient
standards: ISO 10993-1, IEC 60601-1-6, ANSI AAMI ISO 14971, FDA Ultrasound Guidance document
Reported performance (2 observations)
source quote (p.13)
“When eliminating CBD and pancreas sagittal from the aggregated results, the accuracy increased to 82.5%.”
source quote (p.15)
“The lower 90% confidence bound for the 90th percentile is 0.95, which is greater than the requirement of 0.8, therefore, the test passes.”
Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.
Predicate network
Postmarket — what happened after clearance
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., initiated 2024-08-15): "If ultrasound systems with software, are changed from factory default to : 1) Milliliters per second (ml/sec, mL/sec) or 2) Milliliters per minute (ml/min, mL/min); then systems wi" Recalling firm matches this device's applicant.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:95254
- re_clearance
The FDA AI/ML device list shows a newer 510(k) K251481 (decision 2025-08-20) from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. for a matching device line ("ACUSON Sequoia Diagnostic Ultrasound System; ACUSON Sequoia Select Diagnostic Ultrasound System; ACUSON Origin Diagnostic Ultrasound System; ACUSON Origin ICE Diagnostic Ultrasound System") — a new clearance for the same line is a change event.
first seen 2026-07-08 · k_number:K251481
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (Philips Ultrasound, LLC, initiated 2025-10-31): "Ultrasound system compatibility issues with Apple devices running iOS 18 may cause a failure to perform live imagining." Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:97843
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (GE Medical Systems, LLC, initiated 2025-09-18): "The Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter (UGAP) measurement data may display inaccurate values representing liver steatosis. This could potentially lead to inappropriate clinica" Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:97726
- recall_reason_pattern
Software/algorithm-related recall in product code IYN (GE Medical Systems China Co., Ltd. Dev. Zone National Hi-Tech; No., initiated 2025-05-16): "GE HealthCare has become aware that the Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) measurement data feature on the Versana Premier R3 and LOGIQ F R3 series ultrasound systems can display previou" Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.
first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:96992
Recalls attributed to this device
Recalling firm matches this device's applicant (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) — same firm and product code, not necessarily this device · initiated 2024-08-15
If ultrasound systems with software, are changed from factory default to : 1) Milliliters per second (ml/sec, mL/sec) or 2) Milliliters per minute (ml/min, mL/min); then systems will perform incorrect unit conversion of liters to milliliters using multiplier 100 instead of 1000, resulting values 10x smaller than actual, which could contribute misdiagnosis or negatively influence patient management
recall event 95254 (openFDA)
Recalling firm matches this device's applicant (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) — same firm and product code, not necessarily this device · initiated 2024-08-15
If ultrasound systems with software, are changed from factory default to : 1) Milliliters per second (ml/sec, mL/sec) or 2) Milliliters per minute (ml/min, mL/min); then systems will perform incorrect unit conversion of liters to milliliters using multiplier 100 instead of 1000, resulting values 10x smaller than actual, which could contribute misdiagnosis or negatively influence patient management
recall event 95254 (openFDA)
Recalling firm matches this device's applicant (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) — same firm and product code, not necessarily this device · initiated 2024-08-15
If ultrasound systems with software, are changed from factory default to : 1) Milliliters per second (ml/sec, mL/sec) or 2) Milliliters per minute (ml/min, mL/min); then systems will perform incorrect unit conversion of liters to milliliters using multiplier 100 instead of 1000, resulting values 10x smaller than actual, which could contribute misdiagnosis or negatively influence patient management
recall event 95254 (openFDA)
Recalling firm matches this device's applicant (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) — same firm and product code, not necessarily this device · initiated 2024-02-23
On ultrasound systems, when Cardiac DICOM SR feature is configured to display either minimum or maximum measured value, and multiple cardiac region measurements are made, and results are exported into the SR feature, then The SR viewer will display the LAST measured value, not min or max, which could contribute to patient condition misdiagnosis or negatively influence patient management decisions.
recall event 94211 (openFDA)
Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device); a recall is shown as device-attributed only when the recall record itself lists this clearance number. Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-07-08.
Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid
Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).
Applicable FDA guidance — what the submission is measured against
FDA guidance documents and guiding principles applicable to 510(k) AI/ML devices in the Radiology panel. A curated reference index, not legal or regulatory advice — each item states its own status, and a draft is never binding.
- Final guidanceRadiology-specific2022-09Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Applied to Radiology Images and Radiology Device Data - Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions
Radiology CADe/CADx · Software premarket content
Original July 2012; current database date reflects a Sept 2022 reissue. Governs CADe device 510(k) content.
- Final guidanceRadiology-specific2022-09Clinical Performance Assessment: Considerations for Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Applied to Radiology Images and Radiology Device Data in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions
Radiology CADe/CADx
Original July 2012, revised 2020; current database date Sept 2022. Covers standalone and reader-study performance assessment for CADe.
- Final guidanceRadiology-specific2022-06Technical Performance Assessment of Quantitative Imaging in Radiological Device Premarket Submissions
Quantitative imaging · Radiology CADe/CADx
Final (June 2022). Relevant to devices outputting quantitative imaging measurements.
- Final guidance2026-01Clinical Decision Support Software
Clinical decision support · SaMD (general)
New final guidance issued Jan 2026, superseding the Sept 2022 version; narrows the device-CDS scope. Applies to software that informs clinical management.
- Final guidance2026-01General Wellness: Policy for Low Risk Devices
SaMD (general) · Clinical decision support
Revised final (Jan 2026); now addresses noninvasive products estimating physiologic parameters (SpO2, BP, glucose). Reshapes the device / non-device line for AI wellness features.
- Final guidance2025-09Computer Software Assurance for Production and Quality Management System Software
SaMD (general) · Postmarket
Final (Sept 2025). Covers software used in production/QMS (incl. ML development-pipeline tooling), superseding Section 6 of the 2002 GPSV — not device software functions themselves.
- Final guidance2025-06Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality Management System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions
Cybersecurity · Software premarket content
Reissued June 2025 (retitled 'Quality Management System', was Sept 2023 'Quality System'); adds coverage of FD&C Act §524B cyber devices.
- Final guidance2024-12Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan for Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions
Predetermined Change Control Plan · AI/ML lifecycle · Software premarket content
Final (Dec 2024). Supersedes the April 2023 AI/ML PCCP draft.
- Final guidance2023-10Electronic Submission Template for Medical Device 510(k) Submissions
Software premarket content
eSTAR has been mandatory for 510(k)s since Oct 2023 — operationally unavoidable, though not AI-specific.
- Final guidance2023-08Off-The-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices
Software premarket content · SaMD (general)
Final (Aug 2023). Applies when a device incorporates off-the-shelf software components (common in ML stacks).
- Final guidance2023-06Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions
Software premarket content · SaMD (general)
Final (June 2023); replaced the May 2005 'Software Contained in Medical Devices' guidance. Documentation level drives the software content of the submission.
- Final guidance2022-09Policy for Device Software Functions and Mobile Medical Applications
SaMD (general) · Clinical decision support
Current version Sept 2022. Frames which software functions FDA regulates as devices.
- Final guidance2021-10De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)
De Novo pathway
Final (Oct 2021), issued with the De Novo final rule. Most relevant to first-of-a-kind devices without a predicate (DEN-numbered clearances).
- Final guidance2016-12Postmarket Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices
Cybersecurity · Postmarket
- Final guidance2002-01General Principles of Software Validation
SaMD (general) · Software premarket content
Still active except Section 6 (superseded Sept 2025 by the Computer Software Assurance final guidance).
- Draft guidance2025-01Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions: Lifecycle Management and Marketing Submission Recommendations
AI/ML lifecycle · Software premarket content · Transparency
Draft as of July 2026 (published Jan 2025); finalization is on CDRH's FY2026 agenda but not yet published. Treat as FDA's stated direction, not a binding expectation.
- Draft guidance2024-08Predetermined Change Control Plans for Medical Devices
Predetermined Change Control Plan · Postmarket
Draft (Aug 2024) extending PCCPs beyond AI to all devices under FD&C §515C; not final as of July 2026.
- Guiding principles2024-06Transparency for Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices: Guiding Principles
Transparency · AI/ML lifecycle
- Guiding principles2023-10Predetermined Change Control Plans for Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices: Guiding Principles
Predetermined Change Control Plan · AI/ML lifecycle
FDA/Health Canada/MHRA joint principles (Oct 2023); companion to the GMLP and Transparency principles.
- Guiding principles2021-10Good Machine Learning Practice for Medical Device Development: Guiding Principles
AI/ML lifecycle · SaMD (general)
FDA/Health Canada/MHRA joint principles (Oct 2021). Foundational, not a binding guidance; IMDRF issued a related GMLP document Jan 2025.
Applicability is derived from the device's FDA advisory panel and pathway — cross-cutting guidances apply to every AI/ML device; panel-specific ones are flagged. Titles, dates, and links verified against fda.gov as of July 2026.