CT 5300

K232491

Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. · cleared 2024-05-03 · product code JAK · Radiology

FDA 510(k) summary for CT 5300 (K232491)

Constat organizes this clearance into predicate context, validation evidence, reported performance, postmarket signals, and reimbursement links. Each extracted claim stays tied to the public FDA source; missing fields remain explicitly unstated.

Validation studies
2
Cited predicates
1
Performance observations
0
Product code
JAK
Official FDA 510(k) database record ↗FDA 510(k) source PDF ↗

Premarket evidence — what FDA accepted

Device typehardware with ml
source quote (p.16)
“Precise image reconstruction is a recon mode where the system uses a trained deep learning neural network to generate noise reduction images compared with standard FBP recon mode for adult patients only.”
AlgorithmAI algorithm, the body joints detection algorithm including CNN architecture, model parameters, inference pipeline, pre- and post-processing
source quote (p.11)
“design of the AI algorithm, the body joints detection algorithm including CNN architecture, model parameters, inference pipeline, pre- and post-processing is same as what is used in the predicate Incisive CT.”
Adaptive (vs locked)FDA source did not state this
PCCPNo
Cybersecurity addressedYes
source quote (p.9)
“Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff – Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions (issued September 27, 2023, document number GUI00001825)”

Validation studies (2)

Bench

sample size not stated

endpoints: acceptable performance for the new models used in Precise Image

Reader study (MRMC)

n=31 patients

endpoints: equal or greater diagnostic quality compared to full dose images processed by iDose4

Reported performance (0 observations)

FDA source did not state a quantitative performance metric — non-reporting is itself the signal.

Each value carries its own analysis unit and task — never compare or pool across devices. Source: 510(k) summary PDF.

Predicate network

Postmarket — what happened after clearance

25
recalls in product code, 24mo
216
MAUDE reports in code, 12mo
-12%
vs code's own 3-yr baseline
9
drift signals on this device
  • recall_reason_pattern

    Software/algorithm-related recall in product code JAK (GE Medical Systems, LLC, initiated 2026-03-26): "GE HealthCare has become aware of a potential security vulnerability impacting AW Server deployed via Edison Health Link (EHL) based CT Smart Subscription used in conjunction with " Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.

    first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:98738

  • recall_reason_pattern

    Software/algorithm-related recall in product code JAK (PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, initiated 2026-03-07): "Philips has identified three software issues: 1. During a continuous CT (CCT) scan, there is the potential that the Gantry could remain at the current scan position after pressing" Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.

    first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:98588

  • recall_reason_pattern

    Software/algorithm-related recall in product code JAK (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, initiated 2025-12-19): "To remove the software applications from certain CT systems as the applications have not received FDA 510(k) clearance." Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.

    first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:98206

  • recall_reason_pattern

    Software/algorithm-related recall in product code JAK (PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, initiated 2025-09-25): "Issue 1: The potential for unintentional continued gantry/couch movement when a specific button series is used requiring use of manual stop. Issue 2. When performing a helical/Axia" Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.

    first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:97699

  • recall_reason_pattern

    Software/algorithm-related recall in product code JAK (Philips North America Llc, initiated 2025-05-29): "Devices with affected software may experience two unintended motion issues that may lead to contact between the Gantry or table with the operator or patient, along with additional " Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.

    first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:97010

  • recall_reason_pattern

    Software/algorithm-related recall in product code JAK (, initiated 2025-05-23): "Due to a software bug the robotic arm may incorrectly guide the instrument compared to the planning defined by user." Recalling firm is another firm in the same product code.

    first seen 2026-07-08 · recall res_event_number:96967

  • …and 3 more.

Recalls attributed to this device

  • Recall record explicitly lists K232491 · Philips North America Llc · initiated 2025-10-29 · Open, Classified

    If the screws of tube heat exchanger on the rotating scanner are not tightened well after replacing. This component may become detached and make contact with other components located within the Incisive CT systems during rotation. Other components could be damaged due to the contact with the tube heat exchanger.

    recall event 97919 (openFDA)

  • Recalling firm matches this device's applicant (Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.) — same firm and product code, not necessarily this device · initiated 2026-06-26

    Potential of failing to trigger clinical scan during Bolus Tracking.

    recall event 99511 (openFDA)

  • Recalling firm matches this device's applicant (Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.) — same firm and product code, not necessarily this device · initiated 2025-12-03

    Potential for incomplete scan due to unstable connection inside of floating sensor.

    recall event 98238 (openFDA)

Recall and MAUDE counts are product-code-level (reports aren't reliably attributable to one device); a recall is shown as device-attributed only when the recall record itself lists this clearance number. Signals are descriptive observables with sources — never a judgment that the device is unsafe or drifting. Snapshot 2026-08-26.

Reimbursement — how devices like this got paid

Not yet tracked — no payment pathway indexed for this clearance (the reimbursement corpus is a growing seed set).

Applicable FDA guidance — what the submission is measured against

FDA guidance documents and guiding principles applicable to 510(k) AI/ML devices in the Radiology panel. A curated reference index, not legal or regulatory advice — each item states its own status, and a draft is never binding.

Applicability is derived from the device's FDA advisory panel and pathway — cross-cutting guidances apply to every AI/ML device; panel-specific ones are flagged. Titles, dates, and links verified against fda.gov as of July 2026.

Related FDA clearances

More AI/ML devices under product code JAK

These are recent clearances in the same FDA product-code category. Shared classification does not by itself make a device an appropriate predicate.

Enhanced Boundary for PCCT

K253560

Ge Medical Systems, LLC

cleared 2026-06-24

Spectral CT Verida Family

K253649

Philips Medical Systems Technologies , Ltd.

cleared 2026-03-27

True Definition DL

K253686

Ge Healthcare Japan Corporation

cleared 2026-03-23

CT Rembra RT; CT Areta RT; CT Rembra

K252992

Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.

cleared 2026-03-23

SOMATOM X.cite; SOMATOM X.ceed

K253574

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

cleared 2026-03-20

Photonova Spectra, Photonova Spectra Select

K253520

Ge Medical Systems, LLC

cleared 2026-03-20

Aquilion ServeSP (TSX-307B) V2.0

K260078

Canon Medical Systems Corporation

cleared 2026-03-13

Bunkerhill Contrast AVC

K260167

BunkerHill Health

cleared 2026-03-06

Constat Precedent · public FDA/CMS data · descriptive decision-support, not regulatory or reimbursement advice. Share this page: constat.dev/precedent/device/K232491